Workflow Hardware Upgrade: Wiebetech Solution
As technology changes, thus do our wants as a lensman. This December, we have a tendency to've upgraded our boxes we use to store our pictures.
Here's our system:
When considering different solutions, we have a tendency to significantly don't just like the Drobo boxes for many reasons, and need to caution you powerfully before considering them. issues abound, as rumored everywhere the net, however, i'm positive that some individuals can sing their praises. Below square measure many issues - every in-and-of themselves would be a reason to not use the boxes. Together, they create a compelling argument to avoid Drobo. If you are not getting to opt for the system we're reviewing and news on these days, then take into account different solutions.
Here square measure a number of the Drobo issues:
Proprietary file format. Thus, if you wish to tug a drive from their box, you can't plug it into a mack or laptop and browse/access the files. Further, unless you re-insert the drives with the precise same configuration as once the files were written, you have got no access to the files.
The drives/boxes tend to be way too slow for drive-access intensive wants like gap, saving, and different file-releated wants.
A reflected drive array isn't a backup, simply responsibility protection. You'd ought to run 2 Drobos to try and do have 2 backups, as no matter you are doing (or is mistakenly affected on one drive) is instantly replicated on the second. So, you are protected against "drive failure", however not Associate in Nursing accidental deletion, or file corruption that then corrupts the file on the reflected drive. A backup wouldn't solely shield you from drive failure, however additionally those accidental deletions, accidental "save" after you meant "save as" file changes, and different unwanted file changes. Further, the Drobo is not a real "mirror", it's Associate in Nursing odd-flavor RAID five.
An electrical fault that fries one drive possible can fry the opposite. you are doing really would like a twin drive system, with redundancy offline (and ideally off-site) so as to be properly protected. after we have each drives mounted (as explained within the video) it's for manual mirroring, then the backup copy of the first drive goes offline (and, in a very excellent world, off-site.) we have a tendency to attempt terribly exhausting to stay drives seperate to safeguard them, and thus, our images.
The Drobo doesn't check the integrity of the information. this is often a haul from a data-integrity stand.
Upgrading and evolving your progress - and also the hardware solutions that you just use to worry for your pictures - could be a important part of your business.
Here's our system:
When considering different solutions, we have a tendency to significantly don't just like the Drobo boxes for many reasons, and need to caution you powerfully before considering them. issues abound, as rumored everywhere the net, however, i'm positive that some individuals can sing their praises. Below square measure many issues - every in-and-of themselves would be a reason to not use the boxes. Together, they create a compelling argument to avoid Drobo. If you are not getting to opt for the system we're reviewing and news on these days, then take into account different solutions.
Here square measure a number of the Drobo issues:
Proprietary file format. Thus, if you wish to tug a drive from their box, you can't plug it into a mack or laptop and browse/access the files. Further, unless you re-insert the drives with the precise same configuration as once the files were written, you have got no access to the files.
The drives/boxes tend to be way too slow for drive-access intensive wants like gap, saving, and different file-releated wants.
A reflected drive array isn't a backup, simply responsibility protection. You'd ought to run 2 Drobos to try and do have 2 backups, as no matter you are doing (or is mistakenly affected on one drive) is instantly replicated on the second. So, you are protected against "drive failure", however not Associate in Nursing accidental deletion, or file corruption that then corrupts the file on the reflected drive. A backup wouldn't solely shield you from drive failure, however additionally those accidental deletions, accidental "save" after you meant "save as" file changes, and different unwanted file changes. Further, the Drobo is not a real "mirror", it's Associate in Nursing odd-flavor RAID five.
An electrical fault that fries one drive possible can fry the opposite. you are doing really would like a twin drive system, with redundancy offline (and ideally off-site) so as to be properly protected. after we have each drives mounted (as explained within the video) it's for manual mirroring, then the backup copy of the first drive goes offline (and, in a very excellent world, off-site.) we have a tendency to attempt terribly exhausting to stay drives seperate to safeguard them, and thus, our images.
The Drobo doesn't check the integrity of the information. this is often a haul from a data-integrity stand.
Upgrading and evolving your progress - and also the hardware solutions that you just use to worry for your pictures - could be a important part of your business.